April 29, 2008 | Retail gone wrong
Listen, I don’t care if it is 35% off. I don’t even care that you can get another $5 off on top of that. I am taking a stand here, because it’s important.
The words “kangaroo” and “jerky” do not belong adjacent to one another. Ever.
That is all.
Posted by Mir @ 11:59 am
RSS feed for comments on this post.
The URI to TrackBack this entry is:
http://wantnot.net/2008/04/29/no-i-say/trackback/























I second that motion.
April 29th, 2008 at 12:32 pmI think it’s weird that they have pictures of the animals on the front. I mean, we don’t put pictures of deer/cow/whatever the heck is in it on OUR jerky (do we?)…
April 29th, 2008 at 12:39 pmIs it awful that I thought, “Hey! My daughter IS having an Australian-themed birthday party…”
No, no, no. Kangaroo jerky is not a good party favor, especially for 3-6 year-olds.
April 29th, 2008 at 12:56 pmMy husband reading over my shoulder wants to know…
what about
Wasaroo Jerky…..
right hon… same thing
April 29th, 2008 at 1:23 pmY’know, kangaroo is pretty good. I’d suspect the kangaroo jerky is good too
April 29th, 2008 at 2:24 pmI have eaten kangaroo jerky! It tastes… kind of like chicken. Seriously.
April 29th, 2008 at 2:34 pmKangaroo jerky seems like something Andrew Zimmern might be found eating in the Australian Outback on Bizarre Foods. *ick*
April 29th, 2008 at 3:04 pmI’m with Kristin and Beth, I’ve had kangaroo, and LOVED it. I imagine kangaroo jerky is similar. If it wasn’t so overpriced (even after the discounts), I’d order some.
April 29th, 2008 at 6:29 pmWas that alligator jerky in the other package?
April 29th, 2008 at 9:05 pmDoes the CROCODILE JERKY sound more appealling?
April 29th, 2008 at 10:06 pm