Happy anniversary, Barbie

Look, I’m no huge fan of Barbie (says the not-very-tall, not-very-busty brunette…), but she is something of a cultural icon. And it’s her 50th birthday! And oddly enough, she still looks… well… like Barbie. Yes.

Okay, so, in honor of her anniversary, Mattel is issuing a remake of the original 1959 inaugural doll, and for a limited time it’s being sold for the original price, too—just $3. That’s right.

As you can see, Amazon is offering free Prime or Super Saver Shipping on her, too, so if you and Barbie are tight, you might want to get in on the deal.

(I do sort of like her bathing suit. But the pink cell phone just reminds me of all the reasons Barbie makes me want to enroll my daughter in football, just to make sure she doesn’t turn into a prissy princess. Heh.)

  • Twitter
  • Kirtsy
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • email

8 Responses to “Happy anniversary, Barbie”

  1. 1
    Connie March 9, 2009 at 3:18 pm #

    Ouch– I am not getting the Amazon Prime free shipping. $16.00 to ship?

  2. 2
    Mir March 9, 2009 at 3:26 pm #

    Ack, it was available direct from Amazon a minute ago. Hmph!

  3. 3
    Connie March 9, 2009 at 3:27 pm #

    Oh well. I really didn’t need it anyway, but couldn’t resist the price.

  4. 4
    Mslil65 March 9, 2009 at 3:33 pm #

    Target has them for $3 too!

  5. 5
    Andrea March 9, 2009 at 4:16 pm #

    I saw these in the Target and Toys R Us ads this Sunday.

  6. 6
    Crista March 9, 2009 at 5:49 pm #

    It’s showing free shipping for me. Well, over $25, of course

  7. 7
    Claire March 9, 2009 at 10:53 pm #

    I guess it was a really limited time, because they’re up to 9.99. And that Barbie is looking super-hoochie I might add. I had to go look, but I was hoping for the classic one-piece bathing suit. I’m with you, Mir- can’t wait for my daughters to learn how to change the oil in a car- even if they wear a Tutu while doing it!
    Claire

  8. 8
    Michele March 10, 2009 at 11:45 am #

    It’s $18.99 today darn it. I meant to come back to this earlier and forgot. Oh well.