There’s a number of deals/stores I cruise through every morning as part of my routine, and this morning’s look through Buy.com turned up this crystal encrusted bling toaster.
Apparently it’s now a huge bargain at $70.
I can say only two things here:
1) That is the ugliest thing I’ve ever seen, and
2) “bling” and “toaster” are two words that don’t go together.
Carry on.
I’m going to hold out for the punk rock toaster covered in pyramid studs.
*sigh* – Russell Hobbs is such a great brand. But now I’m losing all respect. STUPID DESIGNERS
You’re right – who needs bling for their toast? Can you imagine anything more hideous than “bling” inspired kitchen design?
I was expecting something far blingy-er. I wanted the entire thing to be dripping in jewels. I guess I will just have to wait until someone fulfills my toaster (in fact, all kitchen appliance) fantasies.
🙂
There’s no WAY I could handle something that shiny early in the morning (which is when I’d be having toast… in case it isn’t clear… or something).
For something that’s supposed to be blingy, it looks so… industrial. Huh.
I was expecting a bedazzled toaster as well.
I think this guy should look up the definition of ‘bling’. This thing looks more steampunky than blingy.
It makes me think of an oversized computer chip.
wtf? that thing is UGLY!
I too was expecting to see something more bedazzled-looking. Industrial bling is where tacky meets boring.